It is a common beginner mistake to consider customers and users to be the same. A little reflection soon reveals that not only are they different, their interests may not even be aligned! Let's see some examples.
Example
|
Vendor
|
Product
|
Customer
|
User
|
Customer-User Interest Alignment
|
Dining at a restaurant
|
Restaurant
|
Dining
experience
|
The host
|
All
diners
|
Good
|
Drawing class
|
Independent art teacher
|
Drawing lessons
|
Parent
|
Child
|
Good
|
Commercial Software License
|
ISV
|
Some
software
|
Evaluator,
Decision Maker, Procurement Person
|
Actual
users
|
Fair
|
AWS
|
Amazon
|
IaaS
|
Cloud buyer
|
Developers
|
Good
|
Gmail
|
Google
|
Email
|
Advertiser
|
We
|
Poor
|
Facebook
|
Facebook
|
Social network
|
Advertiser
|
We
|
Poor
|
Twitter
|
Twitter
|
Microblogging
network
|
Advertiser
|
We
|
Poor
|
But that doesn’t make sense. Why would Google, Facebook and Twitter create products that generate a conflict of interest between customer and user? They don’t. We’ve got the wrong picture. The product isn’t what we think it is. Here is the real deal:
Example
|
Vendor
|
Product
|
Customer
|
User
|
Customer-User Interest Alignment
|
|||||
Gmail
|
Google
|
We
|
Advertiser
|
Ad
platform users
|
Good
|
|||||
Facebook
|
Facebook
|
We
|
Advertiser
|
Ad platform users
|
Good
|
|||||
Twitter
|
Twitter
|
We
|
Advertiser
|
Ad
platform users
|
Good
|
|||||
We are
the product that is probed, segmented, analyzed and sold to the highest bidder.
What we experience as the product (email, social network etc) is merely the farm meant to rear the real product – us. This is the sad inescapable reality of any business that chooses advertising instead of subscriptions as its revenue model.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.